Order reversed and the information dismissed. The violation of harassment was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, the conduct involved did not constitute a violation or come within the scope of the statute (People v Carvelas,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. OTTO
40 N.Y.2d 864 (1976)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry Otto, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted September 10, 1976.
Decided October 14, 1976.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.