1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 51 A.D.2d
  5. 51 A.D.2d 851 (1976)
 

PURDY v. MOMROW

51 A.D.2d 851 (1976)

Joan D. Purdy, Respondent, v. Gerald Momrow, Defendant, and Andrew Lindeman, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Stephen Purdy, an Infant, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

February 26, 1976

In order to grant a motion for a directed verdict, the court must find that there was no rational process by which the jury could have found for the adverse party. (See Parvi v City of Kingston, 51 A.D.2d 846.) The record establishes that the third-party defendant, Stephen Purdy, so operated the plaintiff's automobile as to disobey a stop sign and enter into an intersection in front of the appellant who had the right of way, whereby...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases