1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 408 F.Supp.
  5. 408 F.Supp. 489 (1976)
 

LAUFMAN v. OAKLEY BLDG. & LOAN CO.

No. C-1-74-153.

408 F.Supp. 489 (1976)

Robert F. LAUFMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. OAKLEY BLDG. & LOAN CO., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

February 13, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald F. Colegrove, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff; Robert F. Laufman, Cincinnati, Ohio, Jay P. Mulkeen, NCDH, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Matthew G. Ash, Washington, D. C., amicus curiae for Federal Home Loan Bank Bd.

Frank E. Schwelb, Housing Sec., Civ. Rts. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., amicus curiae for United States of America.

Louis A. Ginocchio, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants.

OPINION

DAVID S. PORTER, District Judge:

This Title VII case, involving "redlining," is before us pursuant to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) on the asserted ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, that no cause of action is stated and that defendants are entitled to judgment in their favor as a matter of law. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is not well-taken and is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases