U. C. B. R. v. BLOUSE

No. 635 C.D. 1975.

23 Pa.Commw. 66 (1976)

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Deeville Blouse, Appellant. Anna Bear, Intervening Appellee.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

January 22, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel E. Cohen, with him Norman Seidel, and Seidel and Cohen, for appellant.

Charles G. Hasson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Elliot A. Strokoff, with him Handler, Gerber & Weinstock, for intervening appellee.

Argued December 5, 1975, before Judges CRUMLISH, JR., MENCER and BLATT, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE CRUMLISH, JR., January 22, 1976:

The question for our determination in this unemployment compensation appeal of Deeville Blouse, employer (Appellant), is whether Anna Bear (Claimant) was properly awarded benefits by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which reversed a referee's denial of benefits upon a finding of wilful misconduct under Section 402(e) of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Law.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases