1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 351 A.2d
  5. 351 A.2d 538 (1976)
 

MILSTAR MFG. CORP. v. WATERVILLE URBAN R. AUTH.

351 A.2d 538 (1976)

MILSTAR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION v. WATERVILLE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY and City of Waterville.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

February 4, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weeks, Hutchins, Frye & Welch by Bradford H. Hutchins, Waterville, for plaintiff.

Jolovitz & Niehoff by Lester T. Jolovitz, Waterville, for Waterville Urban Renewal Authority.

Shiro & Jabar by J. William Batten, John P. Jabar, Waterville, for City of Waterville.

Before DUFRESNE, C. J., and WEATHERBEE, POMEROY, WERNICK, ARCHIBALD, and DELAHANTY, JJ.

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

This matter comes before us both on appeal and on report. Since the appeal is from the mandate reporting the case, it is evident that sustaining the appeal would automatically void this mandate. Therefore, our preliminary concern is with the issues raised by the appeal.

Waterville Urban Renewal Authority (Authority) in the exercise of its power of eminent domain (30 M.R.S.A. § 4807) acquired title to certain real estate in Waterville...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases