DUFLOTH v. CITY OF MONTICELLO

No. 46032.

241 N.W.2d 645 (1976)

Donald DUFLOTH, Relator, v. CITY OF MONTICELLO, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 9, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Connolly & Heffernan and Donald J. Heffernan, St. Paul, for relator.

Scholle & Scholle and Jerry E. Hess, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


PER CURIAM.

The employee seeks review of a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board denying his petition for benefits on the grounds that his alleged injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. The board found that his injuries were sustained in an assault by an assailant motivated by personal animosity toward the employee arising from circumstances unrelated to his employment.1

The fundamental question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases