The board found that claimant's periods of unemployment were contrived and manipulated based primarily on the facts that claimant's first period of unemployment terminated when her rights to receive benefits terminated and that she worked 22 weeks and then refiled for benefits. Considering the plan apparently adopted by the claimant and her son, the employer, there was substantial evidence to sustain the conclusion found by the board. (See Matter of Hirsch [Catherwood...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
