1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 228 S.E.2d
  5. 228 S.E.2d 627 (1976)
 

MANGANELLO v. PERMASTONE, INC.

No. 7612SC275.

228 S.E.2d 627 (1976)

30 N.C. App. 696

Samuel MANGANELLO v. PERMASTONE, INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 6, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Geimer & Glusman, P. A. by Kenneth Glusman, Fayetteville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Clark, Clark, Shaw & Clark by Heman R. Clark, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellee.

BRITT, Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant's motion for directed verdict. We hold that the court did not err.

The degree of care that the proprietor of a swimming facility owes his customers is well summarized in Wilkins v. Warren, 250 N.C. 217, 219, 108 S.E.2d 230, 232 (1959), where our Supreme Court said:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases