The board found: "Claimant contended that he was not insubordinate and that he was discharged because of his attempt to organize the workers of the employer. This contention is rejected because he was late after warning and more importantly, he was insubordinate to his supervisor who requested him to put down the newspaper he was reading and resume his work. The evidence does not support claimant's contention that he was discharged because of his attempt to unionize the employees...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
