PEOPLE v. DURGIN


53 A.D.2d 794 (1976)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard E. Durgin, Jr., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

June 24, 1976


The sentence of an indeterminate term of not more than six years for armed robbery cannot be said to amount to a clear abuse of discretion (People v Dittmar, 41 A.D.2d 788; People v Caputo, 13 A.D.2d 861). Nor do the mandatory sentence provisions of section 70.00 of the Penal Law violate the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution (People v Broadie, 37...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases