1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 238 N.W.2d
  5. 238 N.W.2d 608 (1976)
 

CUSTOM FARM SERVICES, INC. v. COLLINS

No. 45583.

238 N.W.2d 608 (1976)

CUSTOM FARM SERVICES, INC., Respondent, v. Leo D. COLLINS, Appellant, James L. Collins, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 9, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo D. Collins, pro se.

James L. Collins, pro se.

Krofchalk & Boraas and Gary F. Krofchalk, Rochester, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appealed pro se from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict. Defendants have not supplied an appendix as required by Rule 130.01, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, nor have they reproduced the transcript of the district court proceeding, aside from the text of the court's charge to the jury, as required by Rule 110.02, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.

Defendants allege several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases