1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 228 S.E.2d
  5. 228 S.E.2d 618 (1976)
 

CONRAD v. JONES

No. 7628SC320.

228 S.E.2d 618 (1976)

31 N.C. App. 75

E. Henry CONRAD et al. v. Riley L. JONES et al.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 6, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Riddle & Shackelford by John E. Shackelford, Asheville, for plaintiff-appellants.

Bruce A. Elmore by John A. Powell, Asheville, for defendant-appellees.

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend the court erred in not determining who had title to the eight-inch sewer line. They base their contention upon the court's failure to make any finding or conclusion as to what interest, if any they have in the sewer line, and the court's following announcement:

"[I]t was not necessary for the Court to decide the question of title to the sewer line built by Southeastern in order to resolve this case. That without deciding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases