Defendant's first contention is that the court erred in denying his motion for a trial order of dismissal following the close of the People's case. During the course of defendant's trial it developed that the substance which he had been charged with selling was dihydromorphinone. The People's expert, Murphy, testified that this substance could be derived from opium or could be synthesized from something else, but defendant asserted that this substance was not listed under...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.