STENEHJEM v. SETTE

Civ. No. 9136.

240 N.W.2d 596 (1976)

Leland M. STENEHJEM and Judith Stenehjem, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. T. W. SETTE et al., Defendants and Appellees.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

March 18, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wheeler, Wolf, Wefald & Durick, Bismarck, and Leland M. Stenehjem, Jr., Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs and appellants; argued by R. W. Wheeler, Bismarck, and Leland M. Stenehjem, Jr., Washington, D. C.

Vogel, Vogel, Brantner & Kelly, Fargo, for defendants and appellees T. W. and Marie S. Sette; argued by Carlton J. Hunke, Fargo.

Pearce, Anderson, Pearce, Thames & Pearce, Bismarck, for defendant and appellee V. R. Uttke; argued by William R. Pearce, Bismarck.


VOGEL, Justice.

This appeal arises from a dispute as to whether Lee M. and Judith Stenehjem waived their right under a 1961 agreement with T. W. and Marie Sette to require the Settes to offer stock in the State Bank of Burleigh County to the Stenehjems before selling it to an outsider. The trial court held that the provisions of the agreement had been waived. We affirm.

FACTS

The State Bank of Burleigh County was formerly located in the small town...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases