1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 55 A.D.2d
  5. 55 A.D.2d 770 (1976)
 

MATTER OF ONEONTA URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY v. W. H. H. REALTY CORP.

55 A.D.2d 770 (1976)

In the Matter of Oneonta Urban Renewal Agency, Appellant-Respondent, v. W. H. H. Realty Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

December 20, 1976

The defendants owned contiguous parcels in the City of Oneonta. The premises had frontage on Main Street, South Main Street and Broad Street. On June 20, 1974 the plaintiff by court order condemned the portion known as 27-41 Broad Street and having frontage of about 151 feet on Broad and South Main Streets and being about 200 feet in depth. The entire parcel was leased to Sears, Roebuck and Company (Sears) and on the premises condemned was located the building used by Sears...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases