Though the divergent testimony of the employee's supervisor and the claimant presented a question of fact as to whether claimant was discharged or left his employment voluntarily, there is no question but that the claimant refused to carry out a reasonable term of his employment. The board found that this deportment on the part of claimant constituted misconduct because there was no compelling reason for the claimant's refusal. Since the determination as to whether or not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
