WHITEHALL LABORATORIES, INC. v. GILLIAM

No. 4864.

536 S.W.2d 286 (1976)

WHITEHALL LABORATORIES, INC., Appellant, v. Opal GILLIAM, Appellee.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland.

Rehearing Denied May 13, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne Gardner (Brown, Crowley, Simon & Peebles), Fort Worth, for appellant.

Ken Fuqua (Wilson, Berry, Jorgenson & Johnson), Dallas, Royce Adkins, Haskell, for appellee.


RALEIGH BROWN, Justice.

This is a products liability case based on strict liability and in the alternative negligence. Opal Gilliam sought damages for burns sustained following her alleged use of Sudden Beauty hairspray, a product manufactured by Whitehall Laboratories, Inc. Judgment for Gilliam in the amount of $145,618.05 was rendered upon the jury's findings of defendant's negligence in failing to warn of post-spraying hazards of the product which was a proximate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases