1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 421 F.Supp.
  5. 421 F.Supp. 401 (1976)
 

UNITED STATES v. RICCO

No. 75 Cr. 411.

421 F.Supp. 401 (1976)

UNITED STATES of America v. Anthony RICCO, a/k/a "Tony Bragiole", Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

September 28, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Fiske, Jr., U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., New York City, for the U. S.; Dominic F. Amorosa, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel.

Goldberger, Feldman & Breitbart, New York City, for defendant; Paul Goldberger, J. Jeffrey Weisenfeld, New York City, of counsel.

MEMORANDUM

LASKER, District Judge.

Anthony Ricco seeks to suppress certain wiretap recordings and their transcriptions which the government proposes to introduce as evidence against him at his trial for alleged narcotics violations. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2516(2), 2518(8)(a) and N.Y. Crim.Proc.L. § 700.50(2), an evidentiary hearing was held August 31 and September 1, 1976, as to the reasons for delay in sealing the wiretaps.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases