1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 227 S.E.2d
  5. 227 S.E.2d 587 (1976)
 

CRUMPTON v. CRUMPTON

No. 80.

227 S.E.2d 587 (1976)

290 N.C. 651

Ruth Harris CRUMPTON et al. v. Malcolm H. CRUMPTON et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 1, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronnie P. King, Roxboro, for respondent appellants Edgar Knox Mitchell, George Edward Mitchell and wife, Mary Mitchell.

Alan S. Hicks, Roxboro, Guardian Ad Litem for respondent appellant Michelle Mitchell and any unknown or unborn persons being or being asserted to be the issue of Edgar Knox Mitchell or George Edward Mitchell.

Graham, Manning, Cheshire & Jackson, by Lucius M. Cheshire, Hillsborough, for respondent appellees Harris Crigger Crumpton, Steve Crumpton, and Brooks Crumpton.

EXUM, Justice.

Appellants took their appeal to this Court claiming that the judgment of the superior court deprived them of property without Due Process of Law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and in violation of the Law of the Land as required by Article I § 19 of the North Carolina Constitution. This appeal is dismissed. The interest of the appellants is still contingent, Strickland v. Jackson,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases