1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 528 F.2d
  5. 528 F.2d 284 (1976)
 

CHANEL, INC. v. SMITH

Nos. 74-2315, 74-2316.

528 F.2d 284 (1976)

CHANEL, INC., and Chanel Industries, Inc., Appellees, v. R. G. SMITH, doing business under the name and style of Ta'ron, Inc., Appellant. CHANEL, INC., and Chanel Industries, Inc., Cross-Appellants, v. R. G. SMITH, doing business under the name and style of Ta'ron, Inc., Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 8, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl Hoppe (argued), Eckhoff, Hoppe, Slick, Mitchell & Anderson, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Robert M. Damir (argued), Zang, Friedman & Damir, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges, and TURRENTINE, District Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This is the second time that the present controversy has been before our court. On the first appeal we reversed an Order granting Chanel a preliminary injunction and remanded the cause to enable the District Court to make appropriate findings. Smith v. Chanel, Inc., 402 F.2d 562 (9th Cir. 1968). Upon remand, the court heard extensive evidence leading to findings that Smith had made numerous false...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases