1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 267 S.C.
  5. 267 S.C. 543 (1976)
 

WHITE v. BLUE CROSS-BLUE SHIELD OF S.C.

20310

267 S.C. 543 (1976)

229 S.E.2d 854

A.M. WHITE, Respondent, v. BLUE CROSS-BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

November 11, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Boyd, Knowlton, Tate & Finlay, and Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., of Columbia, for Appellants.

Messrs. Stephen & Cummings, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

Messrs. Boyd, Knowlton, Tate & Finlay, and Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., for Appellants, in Reply.

November 11, 1976.

RHODES, Justice:

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment to plaintiff-respondent on the ground that an amendment to the Major Medical Benefits Contract between Blue Cross-Blue Shield and the State of South Carolina was ineffectual in that it was not executed by an appropriate official of the State of South Carolina. We reverse.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases