Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion for summary judgment denied.
Plaintiff was required to give notice to its tenants of any regulation adopted by it restricting the harboring of dogs. The occupancy agreement executed by and between plaintiff and defendant requires notice, but does not require notice by mail. There is a dispute as to whether any notice was given and, hence, a trial is required to determine whether
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
