1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 537 S.W.2d
  5. 537 S.W.2d 264 (1976)
 

VINDEL v. STATE

No. 52100.

537 S.W.2d 264 (1976)

Modesto Joe VINDEL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 9, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence T. Newman, Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough and Donald R. Stricklin, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., and David S. McAngus, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty to a jury, the appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated robbery; punishment was assessed at ten years.

In his sole ground of error appellant alleges:

"The failure to remove Ms. Serena as interpreter and to appoint a new interpreter to translate the questions directed to the defendant and to translate the defendant's answers to these questions was error."

Appellant contends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases