Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of grand larceny in the third degree and the sentence thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed.
We have already held, on the facts of a similar case, that the defendant could not have committed robbery in the first degree without at the same time having committed grand larceny in the third degree. (People v Matos,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
