Order affirmed.
The evidence before the Grand Jury, consisting solely of circumstantial evidence, was legally insufficient. Such evidence must logically point to the defendant's guilt and must exclude to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis of innocence (see People v Eckert,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.