1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 422 F.Supp.
  5. 422 F.Supp. 372 (1976)
 

BELL TEL. LABORATORIES, INC. v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO.

Civ. A. No. 74-238.

422 F.Supp. 372 (1976)

BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY and General Instrument Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

July 19, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard F. Corroon, and Peter M. Siegloff, of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Del. (Albert E. Fey, and Robert C. Morgan, of Fish & Neave, Edward Dreyfus, New York City, Peter V. D. Wilde, Murray Hill, N. J., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Thomas S. Lodge, of Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, Del., Dugald S. McDougall, and Melvin M. Goldenberg, of McDougall, Hersh & Scott, Chicago, Ill. (Robert Thompson, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for defendant Hughes Aircraft Co.

OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. ("BTL"), seeks relief under 35 U.S.C. § 2911 against defendants Hughes Aircraft Co. ("Hughes") and General Instruments Corp. ("G.I."). BTL alleges that an interference exists between its United States Letters Patent Number 3,475,234 (the Kerwin patent), and United States Letters Patent Numbers 3,544,399 (the Dill patent) and 3,576...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases