VAN WINKLE v. McLUCAS

No. 75-2145.

537 F.2d 246 (1976)

Martin L. VAN WINKLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John L. McLUCAS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided June 25, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William W. Milligan, U. S. Atty., Dayton, Ohio, Robert E. Kopp, John M. Rogers, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellant.

Gerald L. Turner, Cross & Turner, Dayton Ohio, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before EDWARDS, PECK and MILLER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The sole question posed by this appeal is whether the federal Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596(b)(1) (1970), was properly interpreted by the federal District Judge as authorizing not only an award of back pay but also an award of interest thereon. The statute in question (with the language specifically relied upon by the District Judge emphasized) reads as follows:

(b) An employee of an agency who, on the basis of an administrative determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases