No. 75-35.

72 Wis.2d 696 (1976)

242 N.W.2d 176

ROSSOW OIL COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. HEIMAN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 2, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by James A. Hauer of Elm Grove.

For the respondent there was a brief by Stevens L. Riley and Losby, Riley & Farr, S. C. of Eau Claire, and oral argument by Stevens L. Riley.


Five issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Does the existence of a franchise or dealership arrangement, absent statutory provisions, preclude the use of summary eviction from real property?

2. Are the dealership regulations of ch. 135, Stats., in effect for the arrangement existing here?

3. Has the appellant established a valid counterclaim for damages arising from the eviction due to a fiduciary relationship or statutory duty...

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases