STATE v. PURYEAR

No. 7610SC421.

228 S.E.2d 536 (1976)

30 N.C. App. 719

STATE of North Carolina v. Earl V. PURYEAR.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 6, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Thomas B. Wood, Raleigh, for the State.

Ragsdale, Liggett & Cheshire, by George R. Ragsdale and Peter M. Foley, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.


VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant brings forward thirteen assignments of error grouped into nine arguments. The first two arguments are in support of six assignments of error wherein defendant contends that the judge erred in admitting what defendant contends is hearsay evidence. Defendant further contends that the admission of the alleged hearsay evidence violated his constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him.

The exceptions are to the testimony of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases