1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 60 Cal.App.3d
  5. 60 Cal.App.3d 699 (1976)
 

SHAWN v. GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE ETC. DIST.

Docket No. 37507.

60 Cal.App.3d 699 (1976)

131 Cal. Rptr. 867

JOEL A. SHAWN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

August 2, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Joel A. Shawn, City Attorney, Kipperman, Shawn & Keker and William A. Brockett for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Nicholas C. Yost and Norman N. Flette, Deputy Attorneys General, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus & Jenkins, Hanson, Bridgett & Marcus, William J. Bush and David J. Miller for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

DRAPER, P.J.

This appeal raises the question whether the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) applies to the decision of Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (District) to increase fares for travel upon a bus line operated by the district. The parties largely argue the case as though the issue were whether an environmental impact report (EIR) is required. But applicability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases