1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 60 Cal.App.3d
  5. 60 Cal.App.3d 696 (1976)
 

FLOYD J. HARKNESS CO. v. HABERMANN

Docket No. 2586.

60 Cal.App.3d 696 (1976)

131 Cal. Rptr. 672

FLOYD J. HARKNESS COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GUSTAVO HABERMANN, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

July 30, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rowell, Lamberson, Thomas & Hiber, Lawrence E. Viau, Jr., and Timothy Born for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Irwin & Thuesen and Donald C. Thuesen for Defendant and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

OPINION

BROWN (G.A.), P.J.

Plaintiff, a California corporation with principal place of business in Fresno County, appeals from an order granting the motion of defendant, Gustavo Habermann, to quash service of summons on the defendant. The summons was served in the country of Mexico.

The essential facts are not in substantial dispute. Any conflicts that may exist, however, are resolved in favor of the prevailing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases