ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant argues that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress Mrs. Morgan's identification testimony. The question presented is whether the identification was tainted by an impermissibly suggestive pretrial photographic identification procedure. Each case has to stand on its own facts, and conclusions of law drawn from the voir dire examination are to by upheld where supported by competent evidence. State v. Smith,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
