Per Curiam.
Respondent's reason for reducing the aggravated burglary verdict to burglary, as stated in the record made for this court, is that, in his opinion, there is no clear distinction in the statutory definitions of the two crimes. Therefore, respondent says, "* * * that even though the jury found and was instructed as to aggravated burglary, the court can only sentence the defendant under the section for burglary."
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.