LEIGH M. CLARK, Supernumerary Circuit Judge.
The only question presented by appellant is whether the judgment of conviction should be reversed by reason of the omission from the court's oral charge (to which there was neither an objection nor an exception) of the principle that the presumption of innocence attends defendant as a matter of evidence.
Appellant leans heavily upon Davis v. State, 284 Ala. 135,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.