1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 398 Mich.
  5. 398 Mich. 352 (1976)
 

CENTRAL FABRICATORS, INC. v. BIG DUTCHMAN DIV.

Docket No. 57229, (Calendar No. 5).

398 Mich. 352 (1976)

247 N.W.2d 804

CENTRAL FABRICATORS, INC v. BIG DUTCHMAN DIVISION of US INDUSTRIES, INC

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 21, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Haughey, Rice & Roegge (by Lance R. Mather) for plaintiff.

Warner, Norcross & Judd (by William K. Holmes and Gregory G. Prasher) for defendant.

KAVANAGH, C.J.

We granted leave to appeal to determine whether an interoffice memorandum between corporate executives, of a purported telephone conversation with a customer, should have been admitted at trial as a "business records" exception to the hearsay rule.

We hold that this exhibit was properly excluded by the trial court. The Court of Appeals is reversed.

Plaintiff Central Fabricators, Inc., sold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases