1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 74 Wis.2d
  5. 74 Wis.2d 675 (1976)
 

STATE v. BECKER

No. 75-723-CR.

74 Wis.2d 675 (1976)

247 N.W.2d 495

STATE, Respondent, v. BECKER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided December 14, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was argued by Jack E. Schairer, assistant state public defender, with whom on the briefs was Howard B. Eisenberg, state public defender.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The facts are not disputed. There was sufficient evidence to convict Darrell Becker of the unlawful delivery of amphetamines, contrary to sec. 161.41(1) (b), Stats., and the unlawful delivery of a counterfeit controlled substance, contrary to sec. 161.41 (2m).

The only question is whether the circuit court had jurisdiction, under the facts of this case, to try Becker when the delivery of the substances was made by Becker when he was seventeen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases