Claimant's denial at the hearing that he discarded rather than deliver third class mail when juxtaposed to eyewitness testimony that the mail truck assigned to claimant was at the site at the time scheduled and that the physiognomy of the operator of the truck closely resembled that of claimant, raised a factual question that was within the province of the board to resolve. (Cf. US Code, tit 5, § 8506, subd [a], par [4], authorizing State agency of Federal employer to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
