OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the record contains substantial evidence to support his conviction. His 1969 prior conviction for robbery in another state was properly allowed into evidence. NRS 50.095. Error did not occur when the trial judge precluded defense counsel's desire to read, during jury summation, an article from Time Magazine. Westenbarger v. State, 91 Nev. 478,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.