1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 55 Cal.App.3d
  5. 55 Cal.App.3d Supp. 19 (1976)
 

PEOPLE v. PRINCE

Docket No. 13378.

55 Cal.App.3d Supp. 19 (1976)

127 Cal. Rptr. 296

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PAUL HENRY PRINCE, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.

January 9, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Paul Henry Prince, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

John E. Howard, Acting District Attorney, and Daniel L. Bershin, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

HOLMES, J.*

(1a) This case, and nine companion cases, decided this day, that were consolidated for briefing, involve the novel and important questions: (1) Is it necessary for the record on appeal to show that the trial court expressly advised an unrepresented defendant accused of a public offense classified as an infraction,1 as distinguished from a misdemeanor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases