ATWOOD v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND


547 P.2d 191 (1976)

In the Matter of the Compensation of Woodrow W. Atwood, Claimant. Woodrow W. ATWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 22, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William G. Purdy, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Frohnmayer & Deatherage, Medford.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FORT, JJ.


LANGTRY, Judge.

This is a claimant appeal from successive orders of a referee, the Workmen's Compensation Board and the circuit court, each holding that claimant, a logging truck operator, was an independent contractor, and not an employe. Claimant was injured in May 1974 while logs were being unloaded from his truck. He owned the truck and hauled logs from the woods to the log dump under almost identical circumstances as those related in our recent opinion in

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases