1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 241 N.W.2d
  5. 241 N.W.2d 485 (1976)
 

KAREL v. BROWN

Nos. 45600, 45878.

241 N.W.2d 485 (1976)

George J. KAREL, Respondent, v. Donald J. BROWN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 23, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peterson & Holtze and Robert C. Holtze, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Nemo, Bell, Stapleton, Brenner & Nolan and James R. Bell, St. Paul, for respondent.

Heard before TODD, YETKA and BREUNIG, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.

PER CURIAM.

In this personal injury action, Donald J. Brown appeals from the denial of a post-trial motion and from a judgment entered pursuant to jury verdict in favor of George J. Karel assessing 67-percent causal negligence to Brown and 33-percent causal negligence to Karel. The only issue on appeal is whether Brown is entitled as a matter of law to a determination that Karel's negligence is equal to or greater than his. We affirm.

We perceive no purpose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases