1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 415 F.Supp.
  5. 415 F.Supp. 308 (1976)
 

DOE v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA

No. C-76-835-CBR.

415 F.Supp. 308 (1976)

John DOE and Richard H. Foster, Plaintiffs, v. The STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

As Corrected June 24, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard H. Foster, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Herbert M. Rosenthal, Stuart A. Forsyth, Ronald W. Stovitz, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER.

RENFREW, District Judge.

This is a suit to enjoin disciplinary proceedings of the State Bar of California ("State Bar") against one John Doe on the grounds that they violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Both plaintiffs are members of the State Bar and plaintiff Richard H. Foster is Mr. Doe's attorney.1 Defendants are the State Bar, Michael E. Wald, a member of the State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases