COMMONWEALTH v. KRALL


239 Pa.Super. 482 (1976)

Commonwealth v. Krall, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 29, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith L. Kilgore, and Spitler, Rowe and Kilgore, for appellant.

David J. Brightbill, Assistant District Attorney, and George E. Christianson, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.


OPINION PER CURIAM, March 29, 1976:

Order affirmed.

CONCURRING OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J.:

I concur in the result reached by the Majority because I believe that the Majority's reasoning is technically unassailable. At the same time, however, I believe that the result is unjust and, therefore, raises a question whether our Supreme Court's decision in Commonwealth v. Clair, 458...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases