1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 62 Cal.App.3d
  5. 62 Cal.App.3d 655 (1976)
 

PEOPLE v. TATEM

Docket No. 8286.

62 Cal.App.3d 655 (1976)

133 Cal. Rptr. 265

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARL MAXWELL TATEM, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

October 7, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

James B. Burns, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Karl J. Phaler and Jay M. Bloom, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

AULT, J.

Defendant Carl Maxwell Tatem was charged by information with burglary of five business establishments located in the northern area of San Diego County in violation of Penal Code section 459. He waived a jury trial, and the case was submitted by stipulation on the transcript of the preliminary hearing. The trial court concluded Tatem had not committed burglary but found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases