Order and judgments affirmed.
Whether the standard of proof for voluntary consent (by the one consenting to the overhearing of telephone conversations) is consent beyond a reasonable doubt or by a fair preponderance of the evidence is immaterial under the facts of this case, for the People have satisfied the more stringent standard. Furthermore, since the eavesdropping was conducted with the consent of one of the parties to the conversations, a warrant was unnecessary...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
