SCHWARTZ v. DICKSTEIN


54 A.D.2d 662 (1976)

Sam Schwartz, Respondent, v. Harry Dickstein et al., Doing Business as Loaf-Eez Sportswear, et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 26, 1976


As so modified, the orders are affirmed.

In this action for breach of employment contract, conversion and fraud, the counterclaim of defendant Loaf-Eez alleged that plaintiff undertook to work as a salesman exclusively for said defendant on a commission basis (later modified to salary and commission). It was alleged that plaintiff, in violation of his agreement of employment, diverted customers of said defendant to other businesses and received compensation therefor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases