1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 14 Wn.
  5. 14 Wn. App. 702 (1976)
 

FRYE INVESTMENT v. SEATTLE

No. 2839-1.

14 Wn. App. 702 (1976)

544 P.2d 125

FRYE INVESTMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

January 5, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Franklin & Watkins, Boyd, Decker, Hanson & Zwink, Inc., P.S., and Roger L. Decker, for appellant.

John P. Harris, Corporation Counsel, and J. Roger Nowell, Assistant, for respondent.

WILLIAMS, C.J.

This case is here to review a summary judgment dismissing a complaint of Frye Investment Company, a corporation, that the City of Seattle did not comply with the environmental protection act before improving one of its streets. We affirm.

The facts are these: Because of the construction of the King County domed stadium, the City, in 1973, proposed to improve South Connecticut Street which forms the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases