Order modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision denying the defendants' cross motion for summary judgment and by substituting therefor a provision to the effect that the said cross motion is granted. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see Wright v Eisle, 86 App Div 356). We do not agree with the holding in Shaw v Williamsville Manor (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MECKLER v. BERGSTOL
53 A.D.2d 662 (1976)
Jerome I. Meckler et al., Respondents, and Kanaje Corporation, Appellant-Respondent, v. Leif Bergstol et al., Respondents-Appellants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 21, 1976
June 21, 1976
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.