STATE v. SCHAUB

No. 75-308.

46 Ohio St. 2d 25 (1976)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SCHAUB, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 21, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lee C. Falke, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Gary W. Crim, for appellee.

Messrs. Boller & Shuffelton and Mr. Michael F. Boller, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

The sole issue for determination is whether the actions of trial counsel for the state in informing the defense witness of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent, calling the court's attention to possible difficulties with the defendant's rights under testimony, and the trial court's subsequent ruling thereon, were prejudicial to the defendant's right's under the Sixth Amendment and Section 10, Article I, Ohio Constitution, to obtain witnesses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases