MILICH v. SCHENLEY INDUS., INC.


54 A.D.2d 659 (1976)

Lester J. Milich, Appellant, v. Schenley Industries, Inc., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 26, 1976


Affirmed, without costs, and without disbursements.

The record is crystal clear that the plaintiff has brought this action because he is not satisfied with the amount awarded to him by the awards committee. He believes he is entitled to more. That is the particular reason for this litigation. In connection with this claim it is well to quote a clause which appeared in the contest pamphlet. This clause reads as follows: "These conditions necessarily contain some elements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases